Monday, February 9, 2009

The Problem with Perception (Part 5 of 6)

Just Another Day at the Movies

Mindful perception is the idea that all of perception, everything we see and everything we experience, is the projected result of what we wish to be. Just like we project the guilt of the broken candy dish on a neighbor, we project the guilt of a broken identity on to the world. Mindful perception differs from Webster’s definition in one very important way. Mindful perception does not merely take cognizance of objects outside of the mind, but rather recognizes that we use perception to fulfill a goal. Mindful perception recognizes perception’s primary purpose: witnessing differences. Everything that I think is outside of my mind is really a reflection of what is inside. The world that we perceive is but a projection of our thought about the world and therefore our thought about ourselves. Mindful perception, then, recognizes that it is projection. All of it, everything I see, hear, smell, touch or taste, is a projection; again, a projection based on what I want myself to be.

Imagine your life as a big 3D movie – without the stylish glasses. There’s a beginning, an end, characters, plots, etc. In this movie, this one that we’ve dubbed “life,” we see no projector. Oh, it is there, but we’re not aware of it at all. With projector denied, we have no conscious memory of it, no memory that in fact we chose the film and flipped the “on” switch. This movie is our one “reality” and the only means by which we know ourselves. With no awareness that the movie is a projection, we seem to have little choice but to identify with it. We identify with what we split off to, what is left, and we deny what we split off from. The movie now seems to be where all the action is. It is our “life.” We look to the screen to inform us of who we are not - thereby establishing who we are. We interact with the characters and the images that we perceive, and we recognize ourselves as one of the characters in the film. Remember, we’re actually back there in the projection booth, but we’ve denied, projected, and identified ourselves out of the booth and on to the screen. We could simply change the film or turn off the projector, if we had the faintest hint that we had a choice.

Now, remember our definition of perception from part 1: perception is an illusion of reality based on our own interpretation of sensory data filtered through the lens of our own awareness. In our movie house, that lens of awareness is the lens of the movie projector. Whatever film is selected for the projector, your film, my film, etc. is filtered by this lens. If there is a smudge or a fly on the lens, it shows up on the screen. If it is blurry or out of focus, we don’t even know until somebody suggests that there might be another way to look at the screen and we whip out those smart glasses. Most of us are simply resigned to a blurry world. As for the fly? Knowing that there is a fly on the lens, most of us would agree that trying to kill the fly on the screen would be more than just a little insane; however, with no awareness of anything but the images on the screen, we continue to swat at the shadows.

Mindful perception changes the world immediately, because we experience the world differently. Instead of being a character in the movie, we begin to recognize that we are indeed the one in the projection booth running the projector playing the film of our choosing with the means to clean the lens or don the cool shades. We change the world by changing our orientation to the world. Mindful perception illuminates the causal relationship between one’s awareness (the lens) and what one perceives (the images on the screen). Mindful perception is not a physical experience but rather a psychological experience, an experience of meaning. The world that we perceive is a projection of our thought about the world. If we want to know what is in our mind, the film in the projector, mindful perception says that we simply need to look at the world, the movie. It is all there. It is all there, because we put it there. We put it there, because we need it there. Who we want to be depends on it.

4 comments:

  1. So the War in Iraq is simply a mass "projection" that we can all see - and we all want it there?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Grace,
    Thanks for the question. You’re hopping right to the tough stuff!

    The war in Iraq is a symbol, just like everything else here. The questions are: What is its purpose? What does it teach us about who we are – about reality? Just like any other symbol of war (differences), it reflects the conflict in our mind (the mind of the one dreamer, not the seemingly separate minds of the figures in the dream - see part 6 next week).

    What we all want is someplace to put our guilt over our seemingly broken identity. Wars are convenient, because they seem so easy to justify. The “bad guys” get to project their guilt on us, and we get to project our guilt on the “bad guys”. We don’t all necessarily want war in form, but we do all want a scapegoat for our guilt. We want the war (our separateness), but not the responsibility for it (the guilt). So back to the broken candy dish, we project the responsibility on to somebody else – the bad guys, God, the universe, evil, genetics, fate, our parents, etc.

    Everything here reflects that inner war, that inner conflict, between being what we want to be (separate/special) and the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  3. :) That's just the way I roll, Dave! LOL Thank you. I have to say that I only understand part of what you are saying here - Looking at life symbollically is an ongoing lesson for me...

    Everyone wants a scapegoat...hum.

    Was Jesus a projection of that common desire then? (I don't know much about what ACIM says about the crucifiction...so I'm going by traditional Christian teachings: He was the sacrifice for our sins, etc.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Grace,

    From Iraq War to Jesus, you keep right on rollin’! :)

    So, Jesus is a symbol, too. No matter one’s religion, he represents something. For most of us, he is a symbol of God’s love. The question we should consider is ‘what does our Jesus-symbol say to us about God’s love and therefore about us?’ Again for most of us, Jesus is a symbol of sacrifice (as you mention), so God’s love is equated with sacrifice. That certainly fits with our definition of “love” here. Not sure it has any meaning in Heaven. How could it? Do we imagine that Everything requires something? Do we imagine that an earthly father would require a painful sacrifice from one sibling for the wrong doing of another? And if not, why would we imagine that a heavenly father might be less compassionate?

    Consider that we may have created God in our image. Believing that we had to “sacrifice” Wholeness in order to be separate, perhaps we projected the guilt over that “broken candy dish” on to God. Now, he’s the “sacrificer”, and we’re the victim of his judgment. Ouchie

    Our Jesus-symbol could also be the reminder that we are not a body, that crucifixion (attack) has no effect on our True Identity. Maybe that was what Jesus was teaching us. The great part is that you get to decide what your symbols mean, but choose with awareness of the choices. Most of the time, we don’t even know that we have a choice.

    Thanks for the good questions, Grace.

    ReplyDelete